Defenders of the Faith

They’re everywhere, and their presence wounds the Spirit. There are bishops among them, and bishops who give them succor, and also bishops who fear them like the secret police. Their cranky, hateful letters in the newspaper were bad enough, but their nasty blog comments are even worse. They are relentless, bullying, eager to pounce and to pull every conversation around to their singular obsessions, which are either homosexuality or free market economics. They boast an invincible certainty, coupled with an utter lack of compassion. And boy do they have time on their hands.

I ran into one of these lamentable creatures today on the America blog. There was an innocuous post titled, “We are all adopted,” the gist of which was that we are all God’s chosen children, and lamenting the fact that the people of Haiti have yet to be adopted by the human family. The word “adoption” set off this jerk’s radar—evidently it says to him gay parents and test tube babies—and he posted in response a gratuitous defense of birth parents that insisted on attacking and demeaning adoption.

I was sorely tempted to hit him with a blistering response—went so far as to draft one, in fact, but thought better of sending it. Then I resented the time and energy he had taken from me, the anger and hatred he had stirred. It does no good to trade punches with these troglodytes, of course. And I could summon no real charity for his sad and stunted soul locked away in its loveless prison.

Musings on Identity

This to me is real: When people look at him, they will see Asian. This is part of who he is. So rather than ignoring or denying this, help him to embrace it. Don’t put him in the schizophrenic position of feeling like a white person trapped in an Asian body.

So: Nurture his Korean-ness. Learn about Korea. Make connections with the local K-A community. Make connections with other K-adoptive families. For mutual support, shared experience. Having adopted him, we must also to some extent adopt his birth country, which in fact I am eager to do.

Yet this is also true: that he is and will be culturally American. What about his desire and need to fit in here? Is it better to emphasize difference or similarity? Can you do both? How? For starters, you actively acknowledge difference as a positive thing to prevent its being considered a negative or shameful thing. At the same time you continue to nourish a sense of essential similarity that is more than skin deep. He is not either/or; he is both/and.

My own father, as a boy, was ashamed of his Italian-ness to the point that he denied it, a fact that later made him doubly ashamed. The pressure to conform was too great, and he had no resources against it—not in his community and not in his family, who could not understand how he felt. He was alone. Would it not have been healthier for him to have grown up proud of his Italian-ness?

What of this: when D feels uncomfortable being singled out? He didn’t fit in the Korean school with Korean kids who spoke no English: this was his sense, not ours. He is not Korean, he is Korean-American. He is an American of Korean descent. Sometimes (often, especially while growing up) he may just want to be an American.

I don’t want him to grow up feeling alone, isolated, confused. There are steps we can take to prevent that. Difference can be a source of strength as well as weakness.

Last night I read the report from The Gathering, a first conference of adoptees, held in DC in 1999. I was encouraged by the tone, which was mostly positive. These adoptees certainly had issues, had pain. But the overall tone was not one of anger. This was a contrast to some of what I’ve seen on the Internet, and in reviews of books like Outside Looking In. (I haven’t read this book yet; I need to work up to it.)

Is it possible that some of these more strident voices have embraced victimhood as their identity? And that they have been encouraged to do so by well-meaning activists? Yes. Is it also possible that I want to deny or minimize their pain because it hurts me too much to think of that pain being D’s, of that pain becoming the central fact of his life?

Yes, the eyes.

The other day, L reported, she was with D in a store aisle when he asked her a question.

“Why are my eyes squinty?”

Stunned, she turned to face him.

“I don’t want my eyes to be like that,” he said.

She knelt and hugged him, kissed each of his eyes, and told him how beautiful they were. That seemed to placate him.

I was shocked when she recounted the incident, and have been grieving about it since. The loss of innocence. The first clear sign we’ve had from him of discomfort with being different. Here it begins.

His outbust came at a time when I was feeling somewhat defensive, questioning the claims of adoptive mothers and others about how much adoptees struggle with racial identity. It seemed to confirm these claims. It woke me up (again).

The temptation, of course, is to (again) go back to sleep. To brush off this incident, forget it until it comes back to the surface and we are forced to face it.

The right thing is to acknowledge D’s discomfort, and to help him face it and surmount it. But how?

First, maybe, by facing my own uncertainty and fear. Not letting this become a bogeyman that gets pushed back into the closet.

Just waking up

Since we got home from camp I’ve been worried about D. It’s nothing he’s done; it’s what I’ve been reading, hearing, of the pain that is visited on adoptees, and particularly transracial adoptees, or TRAs, as they call themselves. From what they say, it seems inevitable that this sunny, bright, wonderful kid of ours will have “issues” that may trouble him all through adulthood, issues related to abandonment and identity. It grieves me awfully to think this.

It is also hard to grasp in his case. We have not had any sign whatsoever of problems. We have not been tested at all by him to this point; on the contrary, he has been an extraordinarily loving, sensitive, good-natured child, a kid whose positive, outgoing personality is remarked on by everyone he meets. Will he be the exception? the one who gets through unscathed?

There’s a lot of rawness in the TRA writing, a lot of woundedness and anger. It can be overwhelming. L is not ready to face it, breaking in on our idyll. I have trouble facing it myself, and can do so only in small doses. I feel drawn to learn all I can, to do all I can, but also frightened by the anger. And a part of me wonders, too, whether some of them are embracing victimhood. Is this just defensiveness? Do I even have the right to think this?

I have also begun to read the writings of adoptive moms who have become activists. I have felt defensive toward some of what they say, too. I have wondered whether they are necessarily “right” about everything—given that their experience does not match my own. Their experience is longer, broader, true. But what they say is hard to accept. Is it possible to push Koreanness too much?

I am myself confused about his identity right now. I have thought: I want for him to know that he is as American as anybody else, an American of Korean descent. But these moms and these adoptees seem to stress Koreanness above all. Certainly part of him is still in Korea.

I need to learn. I need to hear from more adult adoptees, and from adoptive parents farther along the road. And not just, I think, from the most pained, radicalized voices, although from those too.

I can’t yet face the birth mothers. I can’t yet feel them, really. But I will need to do that too. For his sake, but maybe for my own sake first? For their sakes?

There is a wall in me that I need to break down.